Bloodborne Review Thread - MetaCritic 93% ~ GameRankings 91.47%

[mornelithe]

Nate4Drake said:

mornelithe said:

No, that's how you evaluate a game.  I prefer reviewers who give the entire picture, not just the parts they're interested in.  That's the difference between a player, and a reviewer.  A player may not care for the MP portion, or the SP portion, but a reviewer is paid to review both portions.  Not meant as a slight toward you, by the way, I expect reviewers to put a bit more effort into their work, than an average player.  That's all.

Not necessarily true.  Some reviewers are serious while others are not; sometimes it's more reliable the opinion of an experienced player than a so called 'professional reviewer';  you never know. It depends from case to case.

Having a sense of humor shouldn't really diminish the amount of reviewing you're doing though.  It's fine not being hugely serious, that's quite alright, but skipping big chunks of the game, and applying a score, seems awfully shoddy.  Remember, the Chalice dungeons are a large part of the replability of the game.