Chazore said:
I'd like games to be funded too but as you can see consoles are not funding every single game on this planet, to say they do is a blatant lie, there are other venues where games thrive just as much but you seem admant on ignoring that fact, I don't think you'll really see it as a win for MS because you know if they paid they'd lose exclusivity because you know how they function so of course it would be good for you if Sony didn't have to take the hit. "What does it give me if the game doesnt exist at all just because its not on my favorite platform?" that is going to need some translation because I don't get at all what you mean by "what does it give me". If you don't mind Kojimas games being exclusive to MS then why do you care if they were multiplat?, for some reason you;re totally okay with his games in the future being limited in scope and platform even if you refuse to buy the other platform which you'd miss out on but if his games were multiplatform then you or anyone else wouldn't miss out, for some reason to you multiplats are somehow dying so damn fast and aren't a thing that should exist unless one console pays for it to happen while ignoring all the other venues. I don't care if you're advocating that game, it's clear you wouldn't buy the console anyway so you're just supporting exclusivity instead of trying to reach more people. |
i am not against multiplatforms, i just think that exclsuivity has the most potential to bring the games the devoloper want to make over what the shareholds want to sell. I certainly dont see EA, Ubisoft or Activision funding a game like Bloodborne or Bayonetta 2. Or funding the development of a game for 8 years like the Last Guardian.
