Give your reason as to why remasters are good/bad

[Wonktonodi]

KLXVER said:

I play Indie games that catch my attention. Love Shovel Knight and The Binding Of Isaac: Rebirth among others. Im just not excited about many of them. They have usually been out for a while before I even hear about them.

The worst thing I hear about Remasters is that "Its for the people who didnt get the chance to play it last gen". Thats just BS. They had their chance, but they decided not to.

So what are the point of these remasters? Is it for people who wouldnt dare to play a game with less than 60fps? People who sold their last console because the games on it werent good enough to keep? People who only play that game?

Theres no point to them. They are just fillers so that publishers can squeeze some more money out of a game.

Remasters are to make money and being a remastered game there will be two potential buyers those who had the game before and those who didn't.

They add to the library while that can be more valueble to someone who hasn't played the game and can even be nice for those who no longer have the system or just wanted to upgrade. They can also build a bigger audience for a sequel when it will be comeing to the same platform.

Plus in cases where they are done well they add content like a game of the year edition as well as better performance/ visuals