starcraft said: DMeisterJ said: starcraft said: Dallinor said: starcraft said: I guess Microsoft was right when they said Sony wouldn't have the resources or know how to do this.
Is it just me, or does Home always look like the Citadel from Mass Effect? |
Err....Home gets delayed and suddenly Sony don't know how to 'do this'? Microsoft has a history of delaying products like: Windows Home Server, Microsoft Office 2008, Windows Vista, RTM etc. because of "performance issues". Looks like Microsoft don't know how to 'do it' either. |
Certainly looks that way. At the very least, it is clear Sony massively underestimated the massive amount of resources needed for the Home undertaking. |
As it clearly looked like MS 'massicely underestimated the massive amount of resources needed for' Vista/Office 08/Home Server/RTM undertaking
|
The bolded and the unbolded were to seperate statements on two seperate issues. Sorry, I should have used paragraphs. I agree with people that say it's better to delay the Beta than to release it unready, but that doesn't mean Sony accurately gauged the resources necessary to create and maintain Home.
Microsoft rushed the 360 and ended up with Rrod because they realized they needed to launch before the PS3 to secure third party support. Sony made a rushed decision to create Home when they realized they were going to get PAWNED in the online arena. |
+1
Thank you for saying that. Lots of Microsoft supporters wouldn't say that.
You're all right, 'mate'.

But yes, sony did rush home, obviously, as we can see. ;_;