I have not yet seen one argument on the internet (and I've read through about a dozen reputable sites) that has a logically sound, un-refutable argument about this movie, about the non-scientific theory of ID, about anything involving this debate. Yes, I agree 100% that evolutionary theory is not 100% perfect and there are holes, which we are trying to fill, as a scientific community. Yes, I agree that natural selection, though proven in many ways, is even less-reputable as a scientific theory.
HOWEVER this is what pisses me off:
If you argue against the theory of gravity, pointing out the plethora of ways in which it does not work, a scientist would sit down and try to come up with an experiment to test out those parts of the theory that don't work. A scientist would sit down and work through the mathematical construct behind it. They would observe the natural universe trying to prove or disprove these 'theories.'
A layman (including theologians) will say "ha-ha! your theory is flawed, I will automatically jump to the most ridiculous assumption and take it to be true because I feel it is true. I don't need all that overwhelming evidence when 1% of your theory is bunk!"
It just is the lowest form of argument. "I made you mess up, so I must be right."
So, unless you can get some real, hard, scientific evidence, observation, etc that logically and through testing can point towards ID being true, stop responding on these boards.
Enjoy
Gods, and try to make the world a better place for your
being in it. If there is no God, you have lost nothing
and will be remembered fondly by those you left behind.
If there is a benevolent God, He will judge you on your
merits and not just on whether or not you believed in Him."
