Reviewers Should Update Their Scores (System Broken)

[PieToast]

curl-6 said:

tokilamockingbrd said:

thats not always the case, sometimes the issue is replayability and if they patch in a mode that helps in that regard it does not mean the game was crap or the devs shipped a lemon.

For instance the single biggest knock on the Order is value. If they added a co-horde mode because players want that it should reflect in the score. Ya it wont go up to a 90% because people also had issues with some of the gameplay (or lack there of) but it would certainly pull it out of the 60s.

And it should work the other way around like I mentioned with my Hotel Analogy. No way MCC should be an 87. It was reviewed in one state and was released and currently is in another. It should be dropped until they fix the issues then it can have its 87 back.

Devs have a responsibility to ship a complete product, bumping scores to take into account post-launch fixes only encourages the insulting practice of "release it now, fix it later".

If a website hypothetically choose to change the score, or maybe post an article about how a game improved after an update, then they shouldn't reconsider just to make a statement about the gaming industry.