By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheJimbo1234 said:
Sharu said:

Some links to the 'proofs' as you say lead to some 'investigations' made by 'independent journalists' over internet. Some - to the fake accounts in the social networks. 
It seems your understanding of 'proof' is very different from the general meaning of that word. 

Also, if you'd try to speak Russian on this forums, i'm sure me and mai will let you do some mistakes in the wordings/phrase construction. Since it obviously will be mistakes. English is not my or mai's first language. And for me is much more important to speak/discuss things with people than to make my wordings ideal.

Wiki does not allow for crappy sources, so how have those ones slipped through the net as you claim?

This comes from account not associated with Girkin as it claimed:
"Immediately after the crash, a post appeared on the VKontakte social media website attributed to Igor Girkin, leader of the Donbass separatists, claiming responsibility for shooting down an AN-26".

This audiotape is a montage with cuts in the middle of the phrases and all: "Pro-Russian rebels discuss the shooting down of an aircraft" -- by far not the first one from SBU.

From the alleged witness interviewed by Reuters: "The rocket was here, it wiggled around, then some kind of rocket stage separated, and then, somewhere toward Lutuhyne, Torez, I saw the plane fall apart in the air. It was only later that we found out it was a Boeing" -- 9M38, Buk missile, has only one stage, so it can't separate anything. But ok, a witness report it is, why not post half a dozen wintess reports that claim they saw a military airplane there at the moment of the crash?

And so on and so forth.

Wiki is a free content and free access , nothing more, nothing less, therefore allows a lot of crap.