Normchacho said:
|
something about the way that is worded is confusing me
like, for example, how can it be determined that the man in question would not have killed himself via another method had he not posssessed a gun?
well we can't ask him because he's dead, therefore, its open to interpretation
so if for instance we want to paint gun owenership as being deviant we can use the interpretation that the gun influenced his decision when he might have been dead set on killing himself anyway







