| ItsaMii said: Here is some professionalism: http://kotaku.com/gaming/gamespot/gamespot-respond-to-zelda-review-backlash-215922.php |
The funniest thing in there too is he admits he hadn't even finished the game hhaa. Stated I'm not very far into it. He didn't even give it a chance haha. He basically played the beginning and made his decision off that.
I like Matt from IGN's response. Simply stated why change something if it's perfect. Zelda has alot of perfection on certain things in the series. Why change it just for the sake of changing it. And then he went on to say the overall number of things that are different definetly outway the stuff that didn't change. I mean the Zelda game had so many different things in there. I personally thought the game was near perfect. Just a great game.
But Eurogamer's review is simply being bias or trying to get attention. Either way he made really not logical points. And really he's outweighed by the majority. Probably like most reviewers not giving really Wii games a chance. They simply play it once and that's it. That's why I like how Matt and Bozon review over at IGN. They at least go in playing the game with a positive attitude to start.
