By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
IamAwsome on 07 March 2015
Edit Thread
Ali_16x said:
Machiavellian said:

What exactly are you basing your opinion on.  Sony had this policy since the PS3.  Just because you do not know about something does not mean it's not still in place.

What I find funny is that MS just adopted Sony policy but really did not change their that much and the knee jerk reaction is this thread.

Crasher Crashers, came to PS3 2 years after its 360 release and it didn't come with anything exclusive to the PS3 version. Same with Minecraft, a year after the 360 version but it didn't come with anything new. I could probably name a lot more. So I'm still not sure where you got the idea where Sony had this policy of only allowing games that came first to other consoles that they had to had something exclusive to PS3. Again I'm sure Sony doesn't care if games came first other consoles they let them publish it. It sure as hell wasn't like Microsoft's policy of just down right now allowing games on 360 if they came to PS3 first.

Also IamAwesome, this proves Sony did not have this policy.

Not necessarily, all of those timed 360 exclusives had something extra in the PS3 release. They appear to be a little more relaxed with indies, but the policy still stands, and like I told WiiStation360, your average indie game doesn't have DLC, so go figure.