If Microsoft or Sony had Motion Controls.....

[mancandy]

OriGin said:
Dude that is such a fanboy 'fact' list.

Personally I prefer the Wii Remote / Nunchuk option but it's an OPINION that it is superior, some people will prefer to use the PS3 controller, some people will prefer to use the Wii Remote and Nunchuk, some small technical features in the Wii Remote don't make it 'superior' for gaming, they just make it 'superior' technically.

This also applies to the PS3, just because it has more technical prowess doesn't mean that it is by default 'superior' to the Wii for gaming, it's just 'superior' technically and that is what the poster that you quoted was saying.

Fanboy fact list? Are those not facts? If not, then I would like you to disprove it.

I see lists and lists of why the Wii is 2 GCs duct taped together. That there are many games that cannot be made on the Wii. That the PS3 and 360 are graphically superior. I am trying to give the Wiimore the credit it deserves. It's true that the PS3 and 360 are much more powerful than the Wii and have more capabilites. I find it funny that Sony fanboys can't give credit where credit is due, it's even funnier when they say the PS3 controller has better motion controls. The Wiimote is of superior design and functionality than that of Sony's 13 year old design.

The PS3 controller has remained unchanged from the last two generations, apart from making it wireless, adding an irreplacable battery, removing rumble and adding half-assed tilt functionality. I think that it the PS3 contoller is worse that the PS2 controller, and worse than the Logitech PS2 wireless controller. If fanboys continue to argue that the Wii's power is last gen, then I will argue that their controller is from 2 generations ago.