By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
bunchanumbers said:
small44 said:

And i don't think they want to lose millions of gamers too by making it streaming only


I'd argue that they would make up in that by saving costs from not having to develop console hardware. Or to ship them across the ocean. Or to stock them in stores. Or to have to print discs. Or to throw giant parties to try to build hype.

See we may see a $400 console and balk. But Console makers have spent years on developing, planning, producing, shipping, and packing these things. Not to mention working out deals with publishers for launch exclusives and cracking the whip on their own first party developers to make games in time for launch. And for what? So people can look at the works that all these people devoted a portion to their lives to and ridicule and judge it because it doesn't meet our expectations on what is 'Next Gen'.

This way there will be no need for console launches. No more wondering if a game is 'Next Gen' enough. Games will already be their best, because they won't have to worry about trying to make a game on outdated hardware.  Gamers today have done nothing but complain and demand the best possible graphics from their games, and this way developers can give it to them. We should be rejoicing at this prospect.

As a gamer we don't care about a compagny profit, a gamers want to fully own their games they want to have the choice to trade their games or give them to a friends.

I didn't see a lot of people complaning about graphics expect pc gamers they think they self superior,consoles was always outdated compared to pc and it was never a problem why it would became a problem in future.



PS4 - over 100 millions let's say 120m
Xbox One - 70m
Wii U - 25m

Vita - 15m if it will not get Final Fantasy Kingdoms Heart and Monster Hunter 20m otherwise
3DS - 80m