What does that mean though? that when a scientists working for an institution, through his/her research begins to believe in ID, that person should be fired? does he/she loses credibility?
Thats like asking if their research starts to point to unicorns employing fairies to create new organisms, do they lose credibility? It's not a scientific theory, nor is it a testable hypothesis, even if you can get people to believe it. Once a scientist stops practicing science, yes they should lose their credibility as a scientist.
For the last time, ID is NOT a scientific theory as science treats theory. It is not a testable hypothesis, it does not make predictions. It is not science. If scientists are not practicing science, then they shouldn't be given grant money or research funds to practice non-science.
and no problem Jcarrey, yours is considerably more in depth than mine. Over step it all you like.
You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.
