By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

PC - TitaN X announced - View Post

vivster said:
JEMC said:
vivster said:

As long as these new cards are not able to properly play 4k there is no bottlenecking in the memory department. Neither Titan or 390X will be able to play current games on 4k60 so at least for me it's not worth it to increase the resolution just yet. Which means I will not run into any bottlenecks, not even with Titan's 384Bit interface.

I'm eagerly awaiting benches. While it's quite possible that the 390X may be able to beat the Titan I'm thinking the Titan might edge it out by 5-10%. And if that's the case there is no other option than to take the Titan. Pascal won't be here anytime soon anyway, and why not take the most mature chip of its generation. Usually that's always a good pick as opposed to the very first generation of a new process. Gonna be even more fun to switch to the more matured version of next gen's technology :)

Or to sum it up, there really is no bad time to buy hardware. You buy it when you need it. If you wait for better technology you will wait forever. I waited now for 3 years to finally get rid of my 680.

Aren't you a exagerating a little bit?

Ever since the first rumors of the 390X started to appear, the supposed performance of that card was 30-40% more than that of the 980, which would put it on the same ballpark as the Titan X. And even if at the end of the day it ends up being 5-10% slower than the Nvidia card, it will likely be a lot more cheaper than it, making it a more sensible purchase.

But of course, if money is not a problem then the Titan X will be the way to go.

 

By the way, AMD brought their Fiji XT card to GDC and used it to power the Showdown demo on the Oculus Rift, but they didn't gave any tech details.

http://wccftech.com/amd-reveals-radeon-r9-390x-gdc-wip/

Of course I'm talking from the point of view of an enthusiast. In those price regions performance is the only thing that matters.

And I doubt the 390X will outperform the 980 by 30-40%. It's more likely it will do that in relation to the 290X.

It's fun to speculate but I do need some benches soon. There's still a chance that I will go with the 390X to help me over until Big Pascal arrives.

The leaked and later proven false benches (I'm not going to hide the fact that they were made up) went in that direction, with the 390X being that 30-40% faster than the 980, not the 290X. But since they were false, nobody knows how they will perform.

But I agree with you, until we have reliable benches all we have are speculations and guesses. We can just hope that the wait for real numbers isn't long.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.