disolitude on 21 April 2008
| dib8rman said: I really get hurt when people say something like: "I bought (insert console here) played a 'game' and (sold it the next day or never played it again or sold it later)" Since when did the console make the games? If they didn't like the controller or they wanted HD or Dvd movies or something the Wii doesn't, isn't and seems like it will never offer then sure. Aside from that comments like the above should just be tossed into the: "Processor lolsz!" section. For the record - the Xbox had the most horse power "last gen" but the ugliest chip set and was only able to go about 17 million polygons (The highest count is 16 currently) without serious frame drops, the GC could go IDK but the highest count is 20 million atm rendered on the screen at one time, by todays standards thats amazing still, specially to do that in HD, not sure if they have yet, but thats expensive. So saying the Wii is graphically under par is true if your saying the PS3 is par. |
Ok there...can you put down a refference for this bold statement?
I've read different reports stating that xbox could do 30 mil easily in real game conditions and 125 mil without other effects. Not to mention render in 480 and 720p.
http://faq.teamxbox.com/detail/1/Xbox-Console-FirstGeneration/
I've also read that Gamecube could do 32 mil max and 12 mil with in game effects.
