By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ohmylanta1003 said:
Wonktonodi said:

The only thing clear is "he didn't like most the games"1

It's easy to give away shit for free. It's hard to sell it to people year after year though. 

It's also easier to say you don't like something without knowing what it is or trying it. I've played many games I never would otherwise without getting then on plus.

As for your assessments on "average gamers" the average gamer doesn't even play on consoles do what's the point bringing then in? If your point was that most console gamers preferred to not pay for plus. That's true and considering that the number of people paying increased tremendously after the launch of the ps4. More people cared about online than the free games. I am in the minority of people who got the service at all and especially for my reasons, but I think it's more from people's lack of awareness than from the quality of the games.


I'm very confused. When I say the average gamer, I am talking about the average console gamer. The average console gamer only plays the few AAA titles that come out each year and do not generally have the time nor the interest to play the smaller games offered for "free" from the subscription service.


Why confused? Must the point I was addressing from average console gamer vs an average gamer. I still don't think there was a point bringing then up though. The average console gamer doesn't play online at all do why would it matter if it's free or not?