Lingyis said:
IllegalPaladin said:
Yea, but that hidden fee is where I'm against Xbox Live. Sure, $400 for the 360, but then the hidden cost of online comes in after in the form of an extra $50 a year. I'd have to factor that in as I like to play games online and if I had it for just two years, that's already an extra $500 for permission to play games online and permission to purchase things from a bigger lst. You pay a premium for a greater list of premium things to buy? Well, I guess its worked so far so your right, lol. |
that's exactly the point--let the people willing to pay for the subscription to subsidize the price cut. why should i pay the extra cost if i don't need PSN? |
But you'd want to play your games online, wouldn't you? That is one of the battles of this generation that the Xbox began to build upon last generation. My argument is just with games because I agree with other content.
If somebody doesn't want to pay for it then that's fine, but I don't think online games should be considered a premium perk when a majority of games coming out will be including online play.
I think the problem would just be that it's hard to say that you really don't need any online at all unless you have no internet access.
