dont be a person who sees something quickly and decides they NEED to disagree. Its much the same problem with the criticism of this game. Its not enjoyable to a person so by that merit they need to find a way to sync that disagreement with some established criteria.
I say this because I wasn't comparing why oot gets a good score and this doesnt. Im saying we are a bunch of sports critics who fell in love with baseball and cannot accept soccer because its nothing like baseball.
Soccer is bland because there isnt enough action. Games end in ties. There aren't any real major superstars. Its long and tedious. Its all luck.
Its a very ethno-centric way of judgement. The "in" is the best, and therefore things that dont conform are of lesser value.