LudicrousSpeed said:
I.. don't even know what the first part of this is trying to say. And we all know the PC is an open platform where publishers can offer their content however they want. See: Origin. EA Access is the closest EA can come to Origin on consoles. They don't need to put it on PC because they already have Origin. Also, PC gamers have already proven they don't care for these types of subscription services. You think PS+ is a great value, but with its loads of indie titles and perks PC gamers are long used to, PC gamers wouldn't give a crap about the service. This is obvious to anyone with PC gaming experience. I take it you never game on PC? It's a whole different world market wise. |
Ok. So you agree that EA access isn't greAt value compared to steam, Origin and ps+.
Seems like costumers don't bother enough with it since it barely tipped the scale in favour of x1 against ps4. It also seems like Sony have a good idea of most of its costumers want.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







