By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GTAexpert on 01 March 2015
Edit Thread
Acevil said:
GTAexpert said:
Acevil said:
NightDragon83 said:
LOL "smeared"... if by "smeared" you mean the backlash the game received for being overhyped and underdelivering with the final product, then yes, The Order was "smeared." Just as games like Watchdogs and Destiny were "smeared" before it.


Don't you know, only Sony exclusives can get negative backlash, because reviewers have it out for Sony. (This is actually the logic some people believe.)

So, did Destiny and Watch Dogs get such bad reviews, despite atleast one of them being a worse game? No.


Were you around for the launch of Destiny? It was getting bashed in, it was later reviewers that started giving it higher score. Since people learned later on, Oh wait this is actually really fun and addictive. (Think it has a 75) (People thought this would be 90+ game)

(I actually think Destiny is an 80+)

Watch Dogs which I assume is what you are saying is the worse game, I think the case of watch dogs is that it didn't live up to the hype, but it didn't break down and was downright bad. It should have got a bit more slack, but its main flaw was not living up to hype, and not actually being bad game. (Think it is has a 80) (People thought this would be 90+ game)

(I am slightly biased for Ubisoft, I cannot tell if the backlash for this game was warrranted or not)

And yes they both had backlash, they were on pretty much all the biggest disappointment of 2014 (namely watch dogs). 

Thing is Watch Dogs is nowhere near as good as The Order: 1886, atleast for me. I didn't have much ype for it, but it was just bad in many ways, and its biggest draw which was the hacking wasn't actually that fun to use.