Exclusive: Critics Admit To Lowering Scores For Attention.

[eva01beserk]

oniyide said:

eva01beserk said:

Not the same, I got to give credit to nintendo here since they dont rehash the same on an anual basis(aside from pokemon wich is happeninng now to do aanual releases). They at least wait 3 years for another game, some only get one game per gen like smash, zelda, kart and others. Even if they where the same thing, we get a little brake and the improvemnts feel more meningfull cuz we get years acumulated of improobements than a little one every year.

This is how i genuinly feel and it is actually one of the things i do like about Nintendo. Now with that being said, serious question. Are these improvements ACTUALLY meaningful or do they FEEL meaningful because the gap in time between games is so much wider than most? 

I think its both. 

there are tiny improbemets that if added the very next year like parkour in shooters(ghost to advance warfare) it dosent get that big of an impact since titanfall already did it, but where to wait another year and parkour pluss who know what the next thing is, lets say underwater levels, then those 2 things can make a game much more diferent then the last, while one at a time feels like is just the same thing as before with a gimmick.

Why else was the lastest assin creed so luke warm in reception, they just added ocean exploration then came back to the same thing the very next year with a litle added bonus of hunting other assasings wich was to litle of a change. And unity went to the root of the previous games but just added multyplayer. Thesse changes went unapreciated.

Its just my opinion by the way, but I do feel that with time more things can be added, even if those things are from other games that are getting riped off, it still adds to the experience and the more you wait, the bigger the change that can happen.