EA thinks EA access isn't good value to its costumers

[Chazore]

LudicrousSpeed said:
3 of the better games on EA Access are not even available on PC.

So does EA give PC owners less games for the same cost? That might piss off console subscribers.
So does EA replace games like NBA Live, Madden, and UFC with other games that are on PC? That might piss off console subscribers.

EA already has Origin on PC. They can offer free games and sales and discounts through there. They can't put Origin on consoles. This is their next best option. MS welcomed it, Sony decided against it so that it wouldn't compete with their own services lol.

Pretty much this right down to the nail, I'm more than happy with getting free games on the house any time I log onto Origin, I haven't really bought anything on Origin since they deal in Euros and not pound sterling but I like their interfacea and the free games, I;d rather take that than pay a sub to access games, it's exactly why I dislike PS+ in the first place.

I don't get why people are spinning this now, almost half a day ago it was "Xbox gets EA access BF hardline earlier than PS" and fans opposite of XBox don't blame Sony but instead blame EA even though Sony declined and said EA access wasn't good enough for them, now hours later after seeing a few small pokes of PC being thrown in we're now at "How come EA access isn't put on PC, maybe not EA is wrooooong" which implies none of it was Sony's fault and somehow Sony have the ebst taste in declining something that competes with them, it's clear to see where the spin is coming from and it;s getting right annoying.

I just wish those sore against EA for this would accept that Sony declined EA Access, this is entirely on them for not supporting it, PC isn't something at all that should even be dragged into this as pointed out that Origin is different to EA access.