By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The_Yoda on 26 February 2015
Edit Thread
Faust said:
The_Yoda said:


Are you being facetious? I'd say EA likely charges the most for their games (I include day 1 DLC, season passes, and the price of online play although not EA's fault, also factors a bit).  Nintendo doesn't charge more they just take a looong time in most cases to drop much from the original price.  I guess I just don't see them nickle and dime-ing their user base. Most Nintendo games all you ever pay is that one time retail price.

oh sry i didnt know DLC was mandatory, and yeah, u pay only once for nintendo games (and basically most games of most companies, but i digress), but u pay full price for almost every game including small games and remaster ( i mean RMk cuz is nintendo) and thats my point. That being said, im not ranting against nintendo (they can charge whatever the think they wort it) but the fans like the OP, like you, cuz im tired of all this "arguments" about nasty corporations milking the money out of the poor sheeps that dont know any better, and Nintendo being somekind of Jesus in the darkness times of the gaming history. Seriously, this is amazing indeed

You're correct DLC isn't mandatory but when it is already on the disc and it along with other features such as online play, are behind a pay wall then i don't consider that to be a full game.  What do you consider to be a full game? What  do you consider to be "full price"? Personally I consider $60 USD to be full price. I get where you are coming from to a degree, I just disagree with "When it comes to software, no company charges more than Nintendo u know..."