By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thismeintiel on 26 February 2015
Edit Thread
MohammadBadir said:
Rafie said:


No it's not obvious. Also, why are you going by word of mouf from reviewers and such instead of making your own judgement? The game is actually good. Although reviewers do have valid points about the game's flaws, they were also a bit too critical of such attributes that may not be a negative to others (QTE's, MP's, etc) I'm not criticizing you about you not liking the game. Just curious as to why you don't think it's a "good" game. There are plenty of good games that has bad sequels too. I'm sure you know that though.

I don't let reviewers dictate what I do and do not play, but unless it's the underrated gem of the century, a Metacritic score of 66 points to it being a bad game.

Maybe it's not a completely bad game, but it's not worth 60$. 7 hours of linear single player gameplay just isn't worth that much in this day and age.

Really?  66 a bad game?  Lol, 4 would be a truly bad game.  66 is actually above average.  An ok game.  Nothing great, but excels in some areas just enough to take it out of mediocrity.  Though, I don't completley blame you for thinking that way.  Not when last gen was nothing but inflated review scores, making eveyone think that 70 was the new average and anything below is shit.