DonFerrari on 26 February 2015
generic-user-1 said:
DonFerrari said:
generic-user-1 said:
DonFerrari said:
Users here seem quite naive..
Say on especialized media that gets ad revenue and free stuff from products they trash... A magazine can make an article comparing Toyota car vs GM and be sincere about points each are better, but you won't see any article openly trashing a car or any aspect of it even if they are making an article about costumer complaining about it. Same for Canon vs Nikon or Sony or etc.
Whenever you want to do real journalism, investigate and trash something you do that with your own money not by the money of the company you are trashing... are you guys for real? |
american cars get trashed in europe all the time. and cheap noname products win tests against the expensive brand ones that pay for ads
|
American cars are trashed or not as highly acclaimed? Have that company paid for ad on that magazine? I said in comparisons they can give better scores for some car against other even if the first is from advertised but they won't Just trash it.
Top Gear in Britain have no ad So they bad mouth even ferrari mistakes and got sued by tesla. In USA they just talk good as far as I know. In most mags and TV channels they just praise the cars there. To the point that several bad cars get "car of the year" award and even Cherry and JAC cars get 4-5 star reviews even getting 0 star in safety tests.
|
american cars are basicly just jokes in europe, ford is the only that gets a pass but well its uk ford over here.
and they do buy ads, a lot of em.
top gear is bbc, they dont care about anything.
|
Please send a scan of a magazine lambasting a car in the same level we are seeing with the order and an ad of that company in the same mag please.
And yes, top gear do what they want, and that is why they have freedom to badmouth and even so they don't trash any company. Very level headed complaints.
