By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
DonFerrari said:
Ka-pi96 said:

Considering how many Xbox One owners in the study owned a 360 last gen I'd assume they mean better processng power compared to the 360.

That would make sense only if they were asking why the person upgraded not why he chose that specific console. Maybe by x360 having better multiplats for a long part of last gen people assumed it were stronger than ps3 and infered that the sucessor would be as well.

 

But if he wanted just specs he should go PC.

 

Myself, I preffer Sony games, policies, design, internal psu and brand as well. Other funny part is Nintendo owners not listing brand but being the more loyalist.

They did ask people for their top 5 reasons though, so it would still make sense if the people that said 'better processing power' also cited 'brand' as an important reason. Then it would be more likely they were comparing it with previous Xbox consoles.

I agree about the Nintendo part, that is quite odd. Although with the #2 reason there being 'better for kids' it may have been that there were plenty of parents in the survey that just bought the console for their kids rather than because they themselves were Nintendo fans.


Your explanation makes sense but would show a severely lacking survey.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."