By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
DonFerrari said:
Funny that a large number of x1 owners said better processing power as reason when ps4 is stronger. Are they frequenters of misterxmedia or just victms of ms barrage of miss information?

Considering how many Xbox One owners in the study owned a 360 last gen I'd assume they mean better processng power compared to the 360.

That would make sense only if they were asking why the person upgraded not why he chose that specific console. Maybe by x360 having better multiplats for a long part of last gen people assumed it were stronger than ps3 and infered that the sucessor would be as well.

 

But if he wanted just specs he should go PC.

 

Myself, I preffer Sony games, policies, design, internal psu and brand as well. Other funny part is Nintendo owners not listing brand but being the more loyalist.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."