By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ToastyJaguar said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
ToastyJaguar said:
He used a simple analogy, reflecting his own views, not that of Epics.

And in response to your number 2. It is a step backwards when you create a game like Gears, and then make a Wii game.

That would be just making an HD game for the Wii. He did not say that. He said "We go forward, not back," which does imply that the Wii is a downgrade, which is false, since even if it was just as powerful as the 6th gen systems, it would mean staying still, not going back. So again, it's a lie.


Ok , but i read it differently. I got a Wii and a 360 and i totally understand what this dude is saying so i guess everyone hates me too then.


Just give sensible reasons why you agree. His reasons weren't sensible.

The Wii isn't what the prefer. Okay, but why lie that it's going backwards to develop for it? Technological challenges are still challenges, regardless of specs. 

The Wii may not be the platform for their games. Okay, but why lie that games on the Wii don't get played?



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs