| RolStoppable said: Kinda surprised that some people took this seriously. I shouldn't be surprised considering what I've witnessed on this site, but still... |
You are just surprised you didn't think of it first.
WiiU would be more successfull if it was named NES 6.
Actually if you look right when Nintendo make a hit they keep the name for the sucessor, but if it declines they change it.
NES success so we have SNES, but it loses market so they just keep Nintendo for the 64, another drop so they drop the company name and put GC, another fail and name changes to Wii, ubber success so they keep for WiiU. Gameboys had the base name untill decline so rename to DS, gangbuster so we got 3DS. I expect both platforms to change name next iteratione and if fused I seriously doubt they would go WiiDS or DSWii or 3DSWiiU or anything that remember the drop.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
