By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran said:
DonFerrari said:


Agree 100%, but we have gone really off-topic =]

Back to the point. I think than more than undeserved hate on Sony I get more incomodated by the unbased praise for Nintendo from reviewers... I know it is opinion and tastes but I can hardly justify their inflated metacritics as I'm certain that if it was the same game but made by MS or Sony it would lose 20 points automatically.

You don't really believe this right? I can already tell you now that Bloodborne and Uncharted 4 will get 90%+ on metacritic.

I guess metacritic scores will be relevant then again? ;)

At least Nintendo doesn't release broken games that still get 80%+ on metacritic (like some third parties). And how did Halo: MCC get 87% on metacritic? It's still not working properly!

I do believe that if SMG launched on PS4 it would be said it is repetitive, rehashed IP, poor graphics and several other excuses to drop the score... I don't disagree of the love for Ninty games, but the scores seem inflated a lot of times.

I know there is a good chance BB and UC4 get over 90, but it is more possible 80-90.

Nope you won't see me thinking metacritic is relevant or true... at most you will see myself celebrating TLOUR got 95+ meta or several critical acclaim (although I preffer to play UC than TLOU).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."