Users here seem quite naive..
Say on especialized media that gets ad revenue and free stuff from products they trash... A magazine can make an article comparing Toyota car vs GM and be sincere about points each are better, but you won't see any article openly trashing a car or any aspect of it even if they are making an article about costumer complaining about it. Same for Canon vs Nikon or Sony or etc.
Whenever you want to do real journalism, investigate and trash something you do that with your own money not by the money of the company you are trashing... are you guys for real?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
