Mikmster said:
Thats why i say the 100 million users is quite irrelevent. |
Sorry the world doesn't fit into your neat black and white categorizations. There's a hell of alot of room between someone who has 1 game, and someone who has 1527 games. The 125 million users, is quite relevant, because they've been on steam in the past 30 days. Beyond that, you really have as little information as we do, regarding the average breakdowns. So, I could just as easily say the vast majority of that 125 million, buy tons of games. Besides, why would you just come in and downplay Steams obvious success? Is there really any point to that?







