| Playstation_prophet said: LOL I'm not sure what the hidden agenda was. The reviews stated QTE and I didn't find many. There's a difference between QTE and pressing triangle to advance the story. Graphics, story, and characters are top notch. The only negative I could find is the game is on the shorter side. The reason for this is the game is built from the ground up, brand new IP, and released 1 year into the console cycle. There's a lot that can be done, yes but quality takes time. How does a 2/10 review get posted on Metacritc? I thought 2/10 was broken and unplayable. User scores are 10's and 0's. Metcritic is broken. Something need to be done. Review numbers are ruining gaming. The Order 1886 is a single player masterpiece in my opinion. I haven't talked or met a single person who disliked it. Sales will show what a great game it is. I can't wait for the sequel. 9/10 I'm interested in hearing other people's opinion like mine that owned a 360 or Xbox One and a PS4. |
I wouldn't give a 9, since the game has its flaws, specifically in the length. But let's analysize the other critics:
- QTEs: honestly, aftre the reviews I expected a QTE fest. Didn't see any, only short QTEs.
- Cutscenes: "oh, the game is full of cutscenes". I'm waiting for this until now. Cutscenes are short and you normally have a short custscene/gameplay section. Reviewers are complete ridiculous. MGS4 (that I love) had massive custscenes (sometimes 1 hour) and it has a 94 Meta.
Well, graphics are really top notch. Like "best ever" top notch.
About reviews, they are broken. Another example is like Driveclub was butchered by not having a working online while BF4 got a 84 while being broken. The funny side is that BF has a terrible campaign with 6 hours and depends completely on the online side, while DC mainly uses the online to add little challenges to the races.
