raidinglarastomb said:
Playstation_prophet said:
LOL
I'm not sure what the hidden agenda was. The reviews stated QTE and I didn't find many. There's a difference between QTE and pressing triangle to advance the story. Graphics, story, and characters are top notch. The only negative I could find is the game is on the shorter side. The reason for this is the game is built from the ground up, brand new IP, and released 1 year into the console cycle. There's a lot that can be done, yes but quality takes time.
How does a 2/10 review get posted on Metacritc? I thought 2/10 was broken and unplayable. User scores are 10's and 0's. Metcritic is broken. Something need to be done. Review numbers are ruining gaming.
The Order 1886 is a single player masterpiece in my opinion. I haven't talked or met a single person who disliked it. Sales will show what a great game it is. I can't wait for the sequel.
9/10
I'm interested in hearing other people's opinion like mine that owned a 360 or Xbox One and a PS4.
|
you do realise that game developers get development kits long before a console is launched? How do you think you get launch titles? Building a game from the ground up is no excuse for having a short game. I believe the main problem is the pacing of the game which can be rectified in the sequel. Also qte's are rubbish unless done right. 2 out of ten is a harsh score but that's metacritic down to the ground it normally averages out with a few undeserved 10 out of 10s.
|
That would be true if you treat each site as an AUHORITY (equal merit) on gaming that are inline with what YOU like. This is like taking some bloggers opionion over your own. This is why each review that comes out I have stopped paying attention to what THEY think of the game. Do you think that MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, BBC are all equal in what they report just because they are all "news" companies? And that's not even mentioning the bat shyte crazy alternative conspriacy theory websites. Back to gaming. This started way back with GameSpot in the late 2000s. I noticed their bias first. Next was Pologon and IGN. As far as those no-name small sites that keep getting post on Metacritic? Ha! Who cares about them? Those sites are just random small sites with unknown biases.
