By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran said:
oniyide said:


The onus for proof is on you. I never said the other two were innovating. No one really is, everything has been done before. You listed a bunch of games and the fact they were spinoffs and sequels to existing IPs negate them being innovative. Except Splatoon but even then thats a third person shooter with a little Portal thrown in. I think you need to look up what innovate means. 

No, it's on you. There's simply no other games like them hence why you refuse to answer.

Splatoon is nothing like Portal. Just because it's a third person shooter it can't be innovative? Lmao, makes no sense.

Captain Toad is a spin-off of a game released this gen you know? :) So that makes Super Mario 3D World innovative. Your logic makes no sense. According to you Majora's Mask wasn't innovative because it's a sequel to an existing ip? Makes no sense. Tell me one game that is like Majora's Mask.

I did answer you, you ignored it and didnt try to say my points were wrong, so that tells me you either dont really believe what you are saying or you dont really know what you are trying to say.

and 3d world is a direct sequel to 3d land. Man you are really grasping at straws.  One game thats like Majora's Mask. Ocarinca of Time for one the orginal Majora's Mask that released years ago on N64 are you really trying to use rereleases to claim innovation? Are you ok?