Why Souls games shouldn't have an easy or normal mode

[Chazore]

Ruler said:

In the 80s and 90s people pulled real coins for credits in the arcade to play hard arcade games most of them they couldnt even beat, yet no one complaimed about them and kept playing. Harder games never stopped people from playing videogames or entaining themselves with them. 

Youre complaining about the devolopers own creative vision, the devolopers know better than anybody else how hard should their own game be. I dont understand why you and others demand an easy mode. Do you also demand MMOs like World of warcraft to have a singleplayer which can be beat in 20h-40h like dragon age to experience the whole game? just because you and others dont want to spend the time and afford?

You dont do that because these MMO games you automaticly keep off from your radar but why are souls games the exception here? Just because bloodborne is an AAA title and has some of the best graphics ever made?

 

I'm not demanding an easy mode though, you're pulling at straws and making it out like there shouldn't be an easy mode for anyone, you are the oen demanding options be taken away, you're also throwing up devs speak as law, except when games happen to be shit they are proved wrong, that their vision wasn't what people shared in, otherwise you may as well say all devs are right, no matter how broken or shitty the game was they were 100% right and everyone else on the planet is wrong with that logic.

I like how in this thread we've got people complaining about handholding or how there's not enough ahrdcore or nightmare difficulties in more games and yet wanting more options is complaining?.

 

For the record WoW isn't a hardcore game, you level up and get better gear, just like you would any other game that gives you higher stats... though a singleplayer warcraft would be nice.