PwerlvlAmy said:
CosmicSex said:
No. That is the type of game they wanted to make. I think people should be allowed to make the game they want. If the game isn't broken, and it does what it says it will do, why should it be punished for not being something else. Should every third person shooter be Gears to be valid? The thing that bothers me about the review process is that games that people really don't like like Evolve are being celebrated as what a game "should be". And I find it disturbing because I believe that our folks are trying to tell us what we should like. Evolve is the first game where people basically said "HELL NO" to the media mind share.
|
Once again, just because you envision something and want to make something, that doesn't mean its not a mistake at the end of the day. You don't get pass just because of your ''vision'' on something.
Once again like someone stated with Uwe Boll. He envisions many things with his movies and they usually end up like duds. Does this mean he makes zero mistakes too since hes just doing what he envisioned?
|
No. You misunderstand. Regardless of whether people like it or not, they didn't make any mistakes in what they were trying to do. They made exactly what they wanted to make. We then come in and judge their work as worthy or not, but at the end of the day, the game wasn't a mistake or an accident. It was a project that they worked hard on. Now, they are free to take a look at comments and decide if they want to make the next version the same way or modify it, but either way, its not a mistake. Please tell me you understand. Please. I can explain it a difrenent way.
