By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I think for some types of games good graphics (and audio and game complexity) are more important than for others. In more realistic games for example meant to be scary, I think relatively plain polygons, weaker lighting, etc is less effective. For cartoony games like Mario64, Zelda, Ape Escape graphics horsepower seems of less importance to me, I wouldn't say it's completely irrelevant though (i.e. R&C PS2 vs R&C PS3). Donald Duck, Mickey Mouse, Pluto, Simpsons, South Park aren't detailed. It depends on the art direction developers take, for example modern animations are more detailed and use better lighting such as Dinosuar, Ice Age and Monsterhouse.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales