On behalf of all The Order 1886 haters, I'd like to thank the PlayStation community for their commitment

[tokilamockingbrd]

RolStoppable said:

tokilamockingbrd said:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=152553101&postcount=3589

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=152553161&postcount=3591

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=152659973&postcount=4578

 

Where are you get all signs are point to a score less than 70? Here are 30 impressions from real people who have played the game. 1 negative impression out of all of them. Some had a gripe or 2 but overall said they liked it.

And with that said. Read the impressions and tell me the game is terrible regardless of what score it get.

I will get this Friday, and am exicited for it.

The signs I was talking about are previews that have been mixed in general (suggesting a lukewarm reception at best), as well as a review from a French magazine that confirmed all the problems while handing out a generous score (15/20) for the negatives that were listed.

When it comes to predicting a Metascore, media outlets are more reliable than impressions of gamers who obviously want to like a game that they just bought for $60. You will hardly find anyone who will straight up admit that they just bought a lemon.

we knew it was going to be devicive. that said I am interested to try it for myself. if its really just 8-10 hours long than really no loss if it sucks. if it does it I can add to the list of games I have played lately where I completely disagreed. (Loved Dying Light, AC UNity, and Destiny, got bored as fuck with GTA 5... go figure right.... last one I agreed with was DA:I and I thought that game should have been a few point higher over all, like 92-94)