The Order 1886 Review Thread - Meta: 66

[thismeintiel]

Angelus said:

thismeintiel said:

Angelus said:

Not if you also take off the ridiculous above average scores 

Lol, those aren't ridiculous.  If those reviewers thought it was that good of a game, then they are more than welcome to give it that.  However, one cannot objectively give it a below average, especially a 20, while talking about how well the game performs technically and visually, without losing credibility.  If you think it's just an average game with great visuals, then fine, rate it that way.  But to rate it so low, either to try and make a point or just for the clicks, is the reason why people are slowly turning away from gaming sites.

Ohhh I get

People can objectively have a very high opinion of incredibly mediocre games, but they can't objectively have a very low opinion of them. That does make more sense now that I think about it

Lol, let's not BS here.  People sometimes use their scores to make a point or for the clicks.  If you are the least bit objective, which I don't expect you to be about this game (I mean you are defending a 20), there is no way to rate this below average.  Average?  Fine.  But, hey, if you want to start knocking off the top scores, I'm all for that if we are also including XBO games.  Ryse definitely didn't deserve that 86, right?