| thismeintiel said: Lol, those aren't ridiculous. If those reviewers thought it was that good of a game, then they are more than welcome to give it that. However, one cannot objectively give it a below average, especially a 20, while talking about how well the game performs technically and visually, without losing credibility. If you think it's just an average game with great visuals, then fine, rate it that way. But to rate it so low, either to try and make a point or just for the clicks, is the reason why people are slowly turning away from gaming sites. |
Metacritic uses Weighted average. While we don't know the exact formula, we know that sites without traffic or credibility worth very little to the Meta Score.
Even if you don't consider them, the score would hardly go up really. The thing will almost always follow IGN (6,5), GameSpot (5.0) and other big groups.
