DrasticDracon on 18 February 2015
So people are saying that it's good business practice, which makes sense. HQ series entries that don't appear annually; I can see those not needing to decrease much in price, even after a year. However... what if it really isn't that complicated, and NoA simply hasn't touched the MSRP of those games for no particular reason. Maybe it would be illogical to think that because Nintendo is a business with policies, but there are many questionable things they've done and haven't done, and maybe this wouldn't stray too far off from the norm...
