dane007 said:
Zekkyou said:
true_fan said: 7.5 sounds too high based on the cons listed. The amount of time you spend watching the game is nearly as much time as you are playing the game, shameful. |
It's shameful for a game with a strong focus on being cinematic to have a lot of cinematic? Huh.
|
but if you are paying 60 bucks for a game or 100 bucks in nz, you would hope to get a bit more gameplay then 4 hours right? Being cinematic si cool, but you don't make nearly half the game cinematic. I wouldn't mind if its was 3 hour cinematic and 7 hour gameplay.
|
Depends on the quality of what's being offered. By the sounds of it, no, 1886 isn't worth a full $60 purchase, but that doesn't mean a game of similar length and design couldn't be. I'd happily pay $60 for 4 hours of Halo or Uncharted, even without the additional 3 hours of cut scenes. It's for that same reason i don't mind paying £20 ($30) to go see a 2 hour film at the IMAX.