The order's 1886 first review 7,5/10

[mornelithe]

ArchangelMadzz said:

mornelithe said:

No, they don't.  They can't just redefine already established words.  Sorry, that's just incorrect and stupid.  If the games below average, give it a fucking 40, why is that a problem?   We've let it go on for long enough, exemplified by how Metacritic has a different scale for Good/Bad between movies and games.  Other people can accept it, but I'll always point it out as idiotic.  Because it is.  We have numbers for below average on a 0-100 scale, and that's 49 and below.

I don't understand why we can't all just have a standard form of:
1-3 BAD
4 Below average
5 Average
6-8 Good
9 Amazing
10 Holy Shit

Or something like that..

It's the scale we need to get back to, since that actually falls closer in-line with what numbers mean in society.