|
Understand the heard part but this is about small amout of people's choice not eleminating vacines. If they made them safer and more spread out Id would feel differnt then I do. Again millions at risk???? There has been in the USA around 11,000 deaths from a preventable disease in the last 65 years. Around 2/3 being 62, 63, 64 & 65 years ago. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/G/cases-deaths.pdf Again way way more die from other reasons, why force small amount to do something they don't feal that's a right choice for there family? Go after more dangerous things. Heres that link again from the FDA and like I said why even list autism as adverse effect if it's "scienticly proven" not to, why list it? http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM101580.pdf. Did you read the other "scientific study" showing aluminum can cause autsim and other nurologicaly damage. http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/14/11/2227/pdf Theres too much articles that are both sides for comfort. One saying no others saying yes. I do believe most vacines are ment to be good, they just need to try and make them safer. Why not? Then there shouldn't be much controversy or any payouts do to severe damage or deaths. |
If you truly understood the "herd part" and actually reviewed historical data on measles, this article would come as no surprise: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/
Based upon your prior rhetoric and last post, however, that link should be revelatory, horrifying, and compel you to recant most of your previous assertions.
