| ExplodingBlock said: So if you remember in the Majora's Mask 3D review, the only con they gave it was "Great Bay Temple", and they gave the game a 8.7 I just finished Great Bay Temple in MM3D right now (Pretty much the same as the n64 version) and how in the holy mother of ASS is that one temple worth of taking of 1.3 points off of the score? The temple isn't even that bad, it wasn't even too hard, just had a lot of guessing, water temple was worse in my opinion. Also they gave the original Majora's Mask a 9.9, so they took off points for pretty much the exact same game I could understand them giving it a 9.5 or a 9 because of some changes they didn't like, but really? Giving it an 8.7 is insane And of course, this is right after they give ORAS a 7.8 because of "Too Much Water" and "Too Many HMs" |
They didn't take 1.3 for that "minus".Not having minus doesn't make the game 10 out of 10.
There is games/movies/series ep. that don't have "minus" and still are not good enough to be 10/10.
"minus" are just the highlights of what,in the reviewer's opinion, didn't work about the game.
Not having highlight doens't mean the game is a masterpiece,just well polished and well design.
