Chazore said:
You forget there being AMD, that Mac and Linux exist, that Vale is creating their own OS based on being as open as possible, being completely free..just like Linux.. It amazes me how you don't look at how Sony and anyone else monopolises games, you make it sound especially like Sony are the rgeatest saints to gaming and we should all be rgeatful for what they bought or own and restrict to who it sells to... You also forget games funded on PC's that are actually successful and wouldn't have been possible on consoles either, that and ones that are funded by PC players and eventually get to grace consoles to which console only users love to add to the list of "exclusive" indie games in their list warz. You still didn't asnwer my question to you in the other thread, why is that?, no need to ask where, you were in that thread. |
Linux, steamOS and macs are created for what? competing with windows? yet whats the point if they dont have exklusives? All i see is less games than windows. They are also all US-american choices so whats the even more the difference? The only other choice is the ps4 and wiiu who are japanese.
These funded indie games are sure not funded by the sole reason to be pc-exclusives by either devolopers and backers, if the indie devolopers would have the choice they would like to release their games on all platforms. Thats why these games ussually start with pc but extend their goal consoles if more money is donated.
I see sony differently, like i said they funded a lot of games, games who wouldnt exist without their money. Whats so hard to understand? and gaming was always owned by a monopoly, look at the first gaming device made by ralph bear, all games were by the same company. Thats how gaming started in the first place.
-what thread you mean?
