padib said:
hsrob said:
Yet the original decision was based largely on the initial fraudulent research. They also site the interaction with his particular genetic mutation, I'm curious what that might be and whether that alone might explain his reaction to the vaccine.
Again, not stating that there are no adverse reactions to vaccines, there are, I've seen them first hand, but a single court decision still does nothing to counteract the existing weight of evidence, there's no new data presented here.
You have pitched this as a 'think twice before vaccinating your kids" piece, rather than what it is, a single unfortunate case where a court has ruled that a young child has probably had an unfortunate reaction to a vaccine.
|
I meant to pitch it more as a "Be attentive to what the media is bombarding you with", and also pointed out to the mad amount of money that pharmaceuticals are reaping from this mediatic blitz.
If a vaccine is legit, I'll disregard the manipulation and swallow the pill regardless. I'm anti-vaxx upto a point. My concern was mostly how things are being shoved down people's throats in terms of coverage and news pieces, and I still think that despite the excellent arguments being brought up in this thread against the concern, the issue of mediatic manipulation is still real.
|
than just do the realy important vaccinations and try to not get the 6X vaccines.
