Magic is Terrorism.

[generic-user-1]

IFireflyl said:

generic-user-1 said:

IFireflyl said:

generic-user-1 said:

sure, evolution is a theorie, but its so well proven that we can take it as fact, sames goes for the theorie behind the birth of the earth... i will now fly away because gravity is just a theorie too, and i dont trust those sciene people...

How is evolution "so well proven"? It isn't. Evolution between kinds is proven. Evolution between species (macroevolution) has never been observed, and has never been proven.

there is no such thing as macroevolution... its all evolution between kind for a looong time. we can observe it now, go to the zoo and look at a polar bear and a grizzly bear, those are maybe one species, but maybe not. its all about how to define species.

Lololololol! If you don't think that polar bears and grizzly bears are the same species then you don't believe in science anyway. Lmfao.

Same for not believing in macroevolution. Here you go:

Berkeley Evolution

Berkeley Macroevolution

You've already proven that you don't know any more about evolution than they teach in high school.

you used macroevolution like a creationist and you link somthing that says completly different things. again, there is no such thing as macro or micro evolution, its all the same mechanism, so if you prove "micro" evolution you automaticly prove "macro" evolution. uc berkley isnt doing a great ob if they use those 2 words because they make it very easy to say uhh that isnt proved(like you tried). the only difference between macro and micro evolution is the scale of observing, not inter and intraspecies evolution. grizzly bears are ursus arctos and polar bears ursus maritimus, but there are hybrids between those two, so one school of biologie wants to count them as one species(because they have fertile offspring in the wild) and another as two(because they look and behave different).