naruball said:
I seriously don't understand this logic. Yes, the game isn't for you, but clearly there's an audience for such a game. Why would you want it to flop just because it's not your cup of tea? Ever heard of God of War? It doesn't have 3/4 points you brought up and still was a great game. What about MGSIV? Haven't played it, but unless I'm mistaken, it was full of cutscenes, the gameplay lasted around 5 hours (there was a trophy/mission for that), and I assume there was no co=-op or multiplayer (haven't played it). Do we really need all the games to fit certain criteria of our own to deserve to do well? I just don't get it, man. |
I hope it flops cause if it becomes a big success there will be more games like that: short, generic, no multiplayer options (even though it's a third person shooter and theres a team in-game), a game that wants to be a movie instead of a videogame. Vanquish at least was excelent, not generic and introduced new gameplay mechanics.
-GOW is a 3D hack and slash is normal to not have multiplayer options and it still was longer than 5 hours.
-MGS games have cut scenes and gameplay apart, they are longer than 5 hours and now have multiplayer.
